What ethical issue may arise if a therapist accepts a phone call from a jurisdiction in which they are not licensed?

Accepting a phone call from a jurisdiction where the therapist is not licensed raises issues related to the ethical practice of therapy, most notably around the legal and ethical requirements of counseling. When a therapist operates outside their licensed jurisdiction, they may inadvertently create confusion regarding their ability to provide services in that location. Such confusion can jeopardize the safety and efficacy of the therapeutic relationship, as clients may assume the therapist is qualified to practice in their location.

Therapists are required to adhere to the laws and regulations governing their licensure, which generally dictate where and how they can legally provide services. Ignoring these boundaries can lead to various complications, including potential legal repercussions for practicing without a license, which could undermine the trust that clients place in their therapists. This situation underscores the importance of recognizing and respecting the established boundaries of licensure to ensure that clients receive appropriate care and support within a legal framework that protects both the client and the therapist.

The other options, while they may touch on elements of therapy, do not address the core ethical and legal implications tied to licensure. For instance, confusion about the therapeutic relationship and emotional impacts on the therapist are likely secondary to the primary legal issue of practicing without a license. Loss of time during sessions does not directly pertain